This is a summary of a session of the Money Management Institute’s 2012 Fall Solution Conference.
This was an interesting discussion since each of the panelists approach asset allocation from a different perspective. Jones believes that modern portfolio theory (MPT) is dead and that asset allocation should be more fluid and dynamic so they shift the pie chart around. Riverfront has a simple methodology, which states that the price you pay is the number one determinate of the upside potential and downside risk of an investment. They feed the price into a proprietary optimization process to create a portfolio that tries to make money in a worst case scenario while still maximizing the upside potential.
Moore agrees that the standard process is deeply flawed and feels you shouldn’t maximize return for a given level of risk. Instead you should figure out what is the maximum level of return that the client can accept.
F-Squared believes that downside risk management has a disproportionate impact on clients, according to Present, so they factor it into their portfolios at a higher level. Standard deviation is used to represent investment risk and maximum drawdown to represent the client’s perception of portfolio risk, he said.
Murray disagrees with Jones and believes there is some value in modern portfolio theory but that it is just one data point. It’s not enough to rely on by itself. At Russell, they know that different asset classes follow different pattens in the market so they use using different asset classes to offset each other in a portfolio by combining long and short term market processes, he stressed. Continue reading